User:Freighttrain/Perspectives on Human Existence, Global Issues, Government and Education

( Updated as of 31/10/2020 )

Contact e-mail : freighttrain@email.com

This is a blog post regarding my perspectives and speculation on the purpose of human existence or why you, I and everyone else exist as individuals (also melodramatically known as 'the meaning of life'), as well as contemporary global issues and proper government and education systems, with a focus on how simple, straightforward and attainable the truth and idealised state of perfection is in all these matters. This blog post is a work in progress and I may add more sections and subsections later.

Abridged contents :
 * 1) Perspectives
 * 2) Human existence
 * 3) The meaning of life
 * 4) Death and religion
 * 5) Contemporary global issues
 * 6) Global overpopulation
 * 7) Bad technology
 * 8) Government
 * 9) Only monarchy and meritocracy
 * 10) The soap opera of contemporary politics
 * 11) Education
 * 12) Summary

= Perspectives =

The meaning of life
The purpose of existing is simply so that you, I and every other individual can engage in experiential development (engaging in desirable new experiences, developing ones preferences and broadening ones perspectives) and the development of individuality, while remaining as unfettered as possible by anything that would hinder this e.g. not procreating with another to make children, as doing so will take up so much of an individual's time, effort and money, which could instead be spent on living ones own life, rather than becoming part of another's life support system.

I see all this philosophic/theological sophistry in many works throughout history as well as contemporary examples, and I just can't believe the kind of long-winded, abstract, ambiguous and subtly biased nonsense that they espouse, clearly the point of existence is simply for experiential development and the development of individuality, what other or higher purpose could there be to life, to get married young and parent children, and live some kind of 'family man' kind of life, you would only be functioning as a bland, outdated and a; in this day and age; societal and environmentally damaging (because of global overpopulation) template, and one that too many other people are filling, you are literally wasting your opportunity at life by living by doing so.

Death and religion
Regarding death, logically it is of no concern to a living being what happens to them after the death of their physical body, because there is currently no scientific proof one way or the other what then happens to a person's consciousness, so why worry about it and let it influence and restrict what you do while your body is alive.

Obviously religions and other forms of institutionalised spirituality attempt to turn this potential insecurity and fear into a racket, by offering to exchange a person's irrational and purposeless fears for a form of moral and ideological slavery while their bodies are alive, as a form of 'afterlife' insurance and moral superannuation fund package deal, except without any proof that they will actually follow through...

The alleged dynamics of this kind of system are fundamentally flawed in so many ways, one example from Christianity is that do you really believe that some allegedly omniscient and omnipotent 'God', would only allow those incredibly boring religiously adherent people into his personal paradise? Hell' no! Such a being would clearly want much more interesting people who have lived very experientially fulfilling lives, naturally this would include people who have freely indulged in all forms of hedonism, controversial visionaries and intellectuals of all kinds, creatively talented people, those who have had very bizarre or horrific lives and maybe even a variety of criminals!

All those boring religiously adherent folk can go to hell and burn for the sin of wasting their precious God-given lives, by living a dull, servile and sterile existence, in the ridiculous hope that this incredible 'God' will find their bland conformity appealing.

Anyone who would argue against this, is basically arguing that their 'God' is not a logical, loving or even an omnipotent God, and why is this Judeo-Islamo-Christian God always referred to as a male, when gender is a purely physical variable, is 'God' a physical being too? Why would he be if his nebulous realm of Heaven is one inhabited by nonphysical beings, literally a realm of ghosts.

Global overpopulation
The only real problem in the world today is global overpopulation, all other problems seen as major global issues are either caused directly or indirectly by global overpopulation, or are simply invented.

Global overpopulation is directly responsible for deforestation and other destructive forms of land clearing, overuse and exhaustion of natural resources, all forms of pollution, immigration and the resultant cultural/ethic disintegration, as well as lower standard of living and just lower standards in general.

Why in this day and age, a person would want to do something as stupid as procreating (really more like mindless breeding in this sense) at something like the age of twenty five or thirty and without being a multimillionaire, is just beyond any form of rational school of thought that I am aware of, not only are they screwing themselves over by having to then live their lives for someone other than themselves (basically forming part of a life-support system for that person or persons), by spending so much time, effort and money to support them, rather than living their own lives with those resources, but they are also helping to perpetuate global overpopulation, especially if they have more than two children.

Only monarchy and meritocracy
Any form of government beyond monarchy and meritocracy, is superfluous at best, monarchy is fundamentally important to a nation's cultural heritage and national identity, because among other reasons, obviously all major and many other nations began as monarchies in one form or another.

A monarchy would also have greater responsibility and culpable than a relatively short-term president or prime minister, if the people are unhappy with the current state of affairs, this is not only because the reigning monarch is usually in power for much longer than a president or prime minister, but also because their performance is a reflection on the royal family as a whole, and the pressure on the reigning monarch to function as a fair and just leader is compounded on them by the other family members, so in this day and age it is basically a self-sustaining system or fair governance.

And regarding meritocracy, this simply means the person who is best suited to a particular role, because their demonstrated skills and track record, will be elected over someone with lesser aptitude, this is a perfect system in and of itself and cannot be improved upon.

It is really as simple as this and so regarding government, anything beyond monarchy and meritocracy would be either superfluous or subversive, and the purpose of a government is simply to help facilitate a society that is as comfortable and sustainable as possible for its members to live in, while allowing for as much experiential opportunity, freedom of expression and individual privacy as possible, as well as retaining and restoring its own cultural and ethnic heritage and national identity.

The soap opera of contemporary politics
Contemporary politics is nothing but a soap opera, with the target audience being energetic young people who want to get riled up about something that they can pretend is real, and intellectually insecure middle-aged men who want to appear worldly, as well as those who get their kicks from class warfare.

Some skills that are often thought as fundamental to good leadership; such as oratory (really nothing more than the 'loudest idiot' principle); are only a secondary luxury to the real functional skills of efficient written and verbal communication. Long-winded and predictably monotonous speeches are a perversion of leadership, and likely also a mild form of brainwashing and indoctrination by way of boredom inducement, more effective communicators could be found within military rather than political hierarchies.

Education
This - after a child has developed the skills required for learning via education i.e. basic literacy and numeracy - based on developing a student's perception of time, space, themselves as physical body and how/why humans exist

When (as in when they are)
 * Local history (of their country)
 * Basic world history
 * Basic history of the universe

Where (as in where they are)
 * Local geography (of their country)
 * World geography
 * Basic astronomy

What (as in what they are)
 * Fundamentals of human biology
 * What it means to be an individual

How/why (as in how and why they are)
 * Religious, theological, spiritual and scientific beliefs about how humans came to exist and why

Now (as in what is happening in the world today)
 * Contemporary global issues, current level of technological development and opportunities/lifestyles available

= Summary = Here are my above perspectives in dot point format:


 * The meaning of life is experiential development and to develop individuality
 * The only real contemporary world issue is global overpopulation
 * Any form of government beyond monarchy and meritocracy is superfluous at best
 * The foundation of a child's education should be formed from when / where / what / how/why / now